In that line-up were also some of the products currently being tested. Good protection on almost all packagesSix months ago, AV-TEST already tested a dozen security packages for the Mac. None of the security packages switched off the internal protection functions of MacOS Sierra. The following versions were tested:- Kaspersky Lab Internet Security for Mac 16All the packages were installed as additional protection for MacOS Sierra.In the test, it was measured on a reference system how long it took to copy 27.3 GB of various data and how long it took to perform various downloads. The lab is able to give an all-clear sign for most packages. Favorably low system loadIt is interesting to note that Mac users have often bemoaned the system load of security packages. Bitdefender, ESET, Kaspersky Lab, Sophos and Trend Micro each detected more than 99 percent of the more than 5,300 test malware threats.The times of the packages from Sophos and Trend Micro are merely five seconds longer, i.e. The packages from Canimaan Software, MacKeeper, Kaspersky Lab and Symantec are equivalent, or almost equivalent, to the reference time. The times clocked for these operations are excellent.For this purpose, all the security products were required to detect hundreds of perfectly clean programs and also monitor many installations of normal applications. Applause: no false alarms whatsoeverIn the last test section evaluated, the packages were evaluated for quality of friend-foe detection. Here, the measured additional system load is between 10 and 16% higher than on the reference system. ProtectWorks and Intego our somewhat more conspicuous. These benchmarks are not really a problem for many users. ESET and Bitdefender require somewhat more time: 9 and 13 seconds respectively, which corresponds to just under 4 and 5.5% additional system load.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Sierra Software Does NotBitdefender, ESET, Intego and Symantec have a 99% rate. Most packages even sort these programs out. To them, annoying software does not create any damage and is therefore not a malware threat.The lab unleashed 195 annoying PUAs on the Macs. The manufacturers, however, take a different view. The testers actually also consider this to be damaging behavior. These programs do not cause any damage, but they are generally very annoying, and they are a nuisance to users. Matias wired aluminum keyboard for mac reviewBut while Bitdefender causes an additional system load of just over 5%, for Intego it already exceeds 16%.With 99.5 percent, Trend Micro also provides excellent detection of malware threats and is also well recommended with only five seconds of additional system load, i.e. Both offer 100% detection with a hardly measurable additional system load.The packages from Bitdefender and Intego also detect all malware threats at 100 percent.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorChristopher ArchivesCategories |